Social Security Fallout Long Way Off
Economic Policy Institute
March 27, 2002
The latest release of the Social Security trustees' report shows-once again-that Social Security is safe for at least another generation, and that, despite the current recession, its future outlook is steadily improving. The trustees revised upward by three years, to 2041, the period over which Social Security is expected to pay full benefits. After this date, Social Security's income is still expected to pay for more than two-thirds of benefits. The projected shortfall can be covered by making small changes in the way the system is financed.
The alternative to small financing adjustments-dismantling Social Security through privatization-is not a workable solution because it would require large transfers from the government and substantial benefit cuts. Under the privatization options proposed by the President's Commission to Strengthen Social Security, the trust fund would either be exhausted in 2027, or promised benefits for today's 35-year-olds would have to be cut by as much as 18%. Moreover, Social Security would still require $3-5 trillion, in today's dollars, to close anticipated financing gaps.
All exhaustion dates extended
The unworkable alternative of private accounts
Common to all three proposals by the President's commission is that they would require large transfers from the government to Social Security to even maintain the program's currently projected finances-in addition to the severe benefit cuts that are proposed. Assuming that two-thirds of workers choose to contribute to individual accounts, the total gross shortfall over the next 75 years, expressed as net present value, would be $5.3 trillion, $2.8 trillion, and $3.4 trillion for options I, II, and III, respectively (SSA 2002). Put another way, although options II and III reduce benefits for everybody dramatically, and although these options lower the insurance value of Social Security substantially, privatization is not able to bring Social Security into balance.
The changes that the President's commission proposed for retirement benefits will also bring about reductions in disability and survivorship benefits. Social Security is a social insurance program that offers workers and their families wage insurance in case they lose their main source of income due to a worker's retirement, disability, or death. About one-third of Social Security's payments go to recipients of disability and survivorship benefits; in 2000 these recipients included 3.3 million children (Weller and Bragg 2001). Because the disability and survivorship benefit formulas are connected to the way in which retirement benefit cuts are calculated, benefits under both programs will be cut if retirement benefits are reduced. This cut will especially hurt African Americans, who depend disproportionately on disability benefits, and women, who depend more than men do on survivorship benefits.
Rather than reducing benefits, which would leave millions of workers without adequate retirement income, proposals to address the shortfall should include options for generating new revenues. For instance, the arbitrary cap above which earnings are exempt from the Social Security payroll tax could be raised or eliminated, a method for increasing revenue that has even found some support within the commission (Kirchhoff 2001). The complete elimination of the cap-currently at $84,900-would affect fewer than 7% of wage earners, but it would cover more than three-quarters of the expected shortfall. Before policy makers pursue the kinds of draconian steps laid out by the commission, they should give serious consideration to the simpler and fairer reform of removing this cap.
This year's trustees report shows that Social Security is sound and its future is getting brighter. Even the trustees' less optimistic projections show the program will pay full benefits for 39 years, and will have funds for two-thirds of benefits in 2075 without any changes being made. Thus, drastic steps, such as risky privatization proposals, are unwarranted, beneficial to only the luckiest few, and harmful to the majority of America's retirees
l l l l
l l l l
Copyright © 2005, All Rights Reserved